Thank you for the response, and I would like to reply to this, not as a continuation of the drama, but as an additional explanation overall from my end.
The work of person who states they are reverse engineer and security specialist - when they are coming to the project is to review the server code the project alredy has, it does not mean that it has to be a new code.
It is embrassment for security specialist not to detect such a trivial and simple vulnerability that is so critical.
LARPing and Larping have different meanings - while LARPing is Live-Action Role-Playing (that’s why the letters are capital), Larping - when someone is pretending to be something they’re not.
Though - by researching into your post on MG forums you were advertising and clearly starting to people you are working on the Skype project on the CrossTalk. IMO, if you wanted to stop the attention to that project, you would be probably against doing such posts on MG, and against of the thread about Skype being there in the CrossTalk, so the development of Skype was staying public in CrossTalk, without any enforcement from the Escargot. Though, I am aware of HIDEN enforcing you to work on the Skype project, so that might be not your decision. The only accusation in this case is by keeping people interested in the Skype project, but at the same time complaining about people asking for ETAs and about status all the time. That’s just obvious they would do that.
What I mean by larping in this case - you are making public posts on forums on this, making people “promised” about the project, while in fact
___
The thing is - you definitely know the person and helped them to publish the originial thread, because otherwise there is no way they would achieve the screenshots of my personal DMs with you. That also corresponds to:
If you would be definitely against CSAM accusations - you would just go to the person who published the thread and would complain about this.
____
Some user out of MG have said “it says right in the thread this is just a “potentially threatening to upload CSAM””, the thing is the thread wasn’t always in this state, it was edited:
____
Long story short - no proper evidence was provided to them - only some screenshot from Discord with gossips - the CSAM allegations were initially ignored. Every court would tell you this is correct - no evidence = no accusations.
I have edited the article based on this information